ECTS - Citizenship and Civil Society
Citizenship and Civil Society (KAM313) Course Detail
| Course Name | Course Code | Season | Lecture Hours | Application Hours | Lab Hours | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizenship and Civil Society | KAM313 | Area Elective | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Pre-requisite Course(s) |
|---|
| NONE |
| Course Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Course Type | Elective Courses |
| Course Level | Bachelor’s Degree (First Cycle) |
| Mode of Delivery | Face To Face |
| Learning and Teaching Strategies | Lecture, Discussion, Question and Answer, Problem Solving, Team/Group, Brain Storming. |
| Course Lecturer(s) |
|
| Course Objectives | The main aim of the course is to provide a general perspective on the concepts of citizenship and civil society. According to the neoliberal understanding, while "citizenship" is seen as a whole of relations between individuals and the state by being reduced to a political and legal bond, the concept of "civil society" is associated with independent forms of organization as a separate structure from the state. However, contrary to this mainstream approach, concepts can take different forms in different periods and contexts. For this reason, this course aims to examine both the concepts in question and their relations with each other with a critical eye. |
| Course Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Content | Freedom; authority; civil society; theories of civil society; civil society in Turkey. |
Weekly Subjects and Releated Preparation Studies
| Week | Subjects | Preparation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction | |
| 2 | What is Citizenship and Who is a Citizen? Origin and Development of the Concept | Güngör M. (2017). “Bir Kimlik İnşası Olarak Ulus-Devlet Yurttaşlığı ve Yurttaşlık Kavramının Dönüşümü”, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2): 438-464. Bellamy, R. (2008). “What is citizenship, and why does it matter?”, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-27. Video: “The future of citizenship”, TED Talks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_w-iURwUYU |
| 3 | Different Approaches to the Concept of Citizenship | Erol, N. (1997). “Yurttaşlık ve demokrasi: çoğulcu bir yurttaşlık kavramına doğru”. N. Bilgin (ed.) Cumhuriyet, Demokrasi ve Kimlik içinde. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları, 119-129. Bellamy, R. (2008). “Theories of citizenship and their history”, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27-52. Video: “Aktif Vatandaşlık”, TED Talks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr4qtTcU4n8 |
| 4 | Citizenship, State and Civil Society | Üstel, F. (1999). “Devlet-Sivil Toplum-Kamusal Alan ve Yurttaşlık”, Yurttaşlık ve Demokrasi içinde. Ankara: Dost Yayınları, 77-93. |
| 5 | Citizenship and Gender | İlkkaracan, İ. ve İlkkaracan, P. (1998). “Kuldan Yurttaşa: Kadınlar Neresinde?”. 75. Yılda Tebaa’danYurttaş’a Doğru içinde. İstanbul: TETTV, 77-90. Moghadam, V. M. (2003). “Engendering Citizenship, Feminizing Civil Society”, Women & Politics, 25(1-2), 63-87. Ek okuma Sirman, N. (1996). “Kadın ve Yurttaşlık”, içinde Sosyal Demokrat Değişme, 1, 78-85 |
| 6 | The Origin and Development of the Concept of Civil Society: From Social Contractors to Hegel | Doğan, İ. (2002). “Sivil Toplum Devlet Birlikteliğinden Ayrılığına”, Özgürlükçü ve Totaliter Düşünce Geleneğinde Sivil Toplum içinde, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 37-71. Ehrenberg, J. (2011). “The History of Civil Society Ideas”, M. Edwards (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society içinde, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15-29. |
| 7 | The Development of the Civil Society Concept: Civil Society in Marxist Doctrine and Alternative Approaches | Doğan, İ. (2002). “Marksist Öğreti ve Sivil Toplum: Karl Marx ve Antonio Gramsci”, Özgürlükçü ve Totaliter Düşünce Geleneğinde Sivil Toplum içinde, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 161-180. Doğan, İ. (2002). “Gramsci’nin Sivil Toplum Görüşünün Kaynağı”, Özgürlükçü ve Totaliter Düşünce Geleneğinde Sivil Toplum içinde, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 216-223. |
| 8 | Midterm | |
| 9 | Civil Society and Gender | Çaha, Ö. (1996). “Modern Siyaset Düşüncesinde Sivil Toplum ve Kadına Biçilen Rol” Sivil Kadın: Türkiye’de Kadın ve Sivil Toplum”, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 23-54. Hagemann, K. (2008). “Civil Society Gendered: Rethinking Theories and Practices”,K. Hagemann, S. Michel and G. Budde (ed.), Civil Society and Gender Justice: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books, 17-43. |
| 10 | Civil Society Debates in Central and Eastern Europe | Erözden, O. (2004). “Sivil Toplumun Karanlık Yüzü: Demokrasiye Geçiş Sürecinde Sivil Toplumun Farklı Görünümleri: Hırvatistan Örneği”, Sivil Toplum, 2 (5), 61-68. Howard, M. M. (2011). “Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe”, M. Edwards (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society içinde, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 134-146. |
| 11 | Civil Society Debates in the Middle East | Sariolghalam, M. (1999). “Ortadoğu’da Sivil Toplum Umutları: Kültürel Engeller Üzerine Bir Çözümleme”, E. Özdalga & S. Persson (ed), Sivil Toplum, Demokrasi ve İslam Dünyası içinde, İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları. Hardig, A. C. (2014). ‘Beyond the Arab Revolts: conceptualizing civil society in the Middle East and North Africa’, Democratization, pp.1131-1153. Film Gösterimi The Square (El-Midan), 2013, Yönetmen: Jehane Noujaim |
| 12 | Civil Society Debates in Turkey | Wedel, H. (2007). “Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nde Sivil Toplumun Nüveleri Demokratikleşmenin Taşıyıcısı mı, Yeni Bir Seçkinler Örgütlenmesi mi?”, Ortadoğu’da Sivil Toplumun Sorunları içinde, F. İbrahim & H. Wedel (ed.), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 137-162. Sezer, T. D. (2008) “Dernek Kurma Özgürlüğünün İçeriği ve Gelişim Süreci Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(1), 1-339. Doyle, J. D. (2017) ‘Government co-option of civil society: exploring the AKP’s role within Turkish women’s CSOs’, Democratization,25(3), 1-19. Video: “Civil society - the power of now”, TED Talks https://www.ted.com/talks/andreas_rickert_civil_society_the_power_of_now |
| 13 | Course Evaluation |
Sources
| Course Book | 1. Güngör M. (2017). “Bir Kimlik İnşası Olarak Ulus-Devlet Yurttaşlığı ve Yurttaşlık Kavramının Dönüşümü”, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2): 438-464. |
|---|---|
| 2. Bellamy, R. (2008). “What is citizenship, and why does it matter?”, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-27. | |
| 4. Erol, N. (1997). “Yurttaşlık ve demokrasi: çoğulcu bir yurttaşlık kavramına doğru”. N. Bilgin (ed.) Cumhuriyet, Demokrasi ve Kimlik içinde. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları, 119-129. | |
| 5. Bellamy, R. (2008). “Theories of citizenship and their history”, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27-52. | |
| 7. Üstel, F. (1999). “Devlet-Sivil Toplum-Kamusal Alan ve Yurttaşlık”, Yurttaşlık ve Demokrasi içinde. Ankara: Dost Yayınları, 77-93. | |
| 8. İlkkaracan, İ. ve İlkkaracan, P. (1998). “Kuldan Yurttaşa: Kadınlar Neresinde?”. 75. Yılda Tebaa’danYurttaş’a Doğru içinde. İstanbul: TETTV, 77-90. | |
| 9. Moghadam, V. M. (2003). “Engendering Citizenship, Feminizing Civil Society”, Women & Politics, 25(1-2), 63-87. | |
| 11. Doğan, İ. (2002). “Sivil Toplum Devlet Birlikteliğinden Ayrılığına”, Özgürlükçü ve Totaliter Düşünce Geleneğinde Sivil Toplum içinde, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 37-71. | |
| 12. Ehrenberg, J. (2011). “The History of Civil Society Ideas”, M. Edwards (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society içinde, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15-29. | |
| 13. Doğan, İ. (2002). “Marksist Öğreti ve Sivil Toplum: Karl Marx ve Antonio Gramsci”, Özgürlükçü ve Totaliter Düşünce Geleneğinde Sivil Toplum içinde, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 161-180. | |
| 14. Doğan, İ. (2002). “Gramsci’nin Sivil Toplum Görüşünün Kaynağı”, Özgürlükçü ve Totaliter Düşünce Geleneğinde Sivil Toplum içinde, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 216-223. | |
| 15. Çaha, Ö. (1996). “Modern Siyaset Düşüncesinde Sivil Toplum ve Kadına Biçilen Rol” Sivil Kadın: Türkiye’de Kadın ve Sivil Toplum”, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 23-54. | |
| 16. Hagemann, K. (2008). “Civil Society Gendered: Rethinking Theories and Practices”,K. Hagemann, S. Michel and G. Budde (ed.), Civil Society and Gender Justice: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books, 17-43. | |
| 17. Erözden, O. (2004). “Sivil Toplumun Karanlık Yüzü: Demokrasiye Geçiş Sürecinde Sivil Toplumun Farklı Görünümleri: Hırvatistan Örneği”, Sivil Toplum, 2 (5), 61-68. | |
| 18. Howard, M. M. (2011). “Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe”, M. Edwards (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society içinde, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 134-146. | |
| 19. Sariolghalam, M. (1999). “Ortadoğu’da Sivil Toplum Umutları: Kültürel Engeller Üzerine Bir Çözümleme”, E. Özdalga & S. Persson (ed), Sivil Toplum, Demokrasi ve İslam Dünyası içinde, İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları. | |
| 20. Hardig, A. C. (2014). ‘Beyond the Arab Revolts: conceptualizing civil society in the Middle East and North Africa’, Democratization, pp.1131-1153. | |
| 22. Wedel, H. (2007). “Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nde Sivil Toplumun Nüveleri Demokratikleşmenin Taşıyıcısı mı, Yeni Bir Seçkinler Örgütlenmesi mi?”, Ortadoğu’da Sivil Toplumun Sorunları içinde, F. İbrahim & H. Wedel (ed.), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 137-162. | |
| 23. Sezer, T. D. (2008) “Dernek Kurma Özgürlüğünün İçeriği ve Gelişim Süreci Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(1), 1-339. | |
| 24. Doyle, J. D. (2017) ‘Government co-option of civil society: exploring the AKP’s role within Turkish women’s CSOs’, Democratization,25(3), 1-19. | |
| Other Sources | 3. “The future of citizenship”, TED Talks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_w-iURwUYU |
| 6. Aktif Vatandaşlık”, TED Talks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr4qtTcU4n8 | |
| 10. Sirman, N. (1996). “Kadın ve Yurttaşlık”, içinde Sosyal Demokrat Değişme, 1, 78-85 | |
| 21. The Square (El-Midan), 2013, Yönetmen: Jehane Noujaim | |
| 25. “Civil society - the power of now”, TED Talks https://www.ted.com/talks/andreas_rickert_civil_society_the_power_of_now |
Evaluation System
| Requirements | Number | Percentage of Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance/Participation | 1 | 15 |
| Laboratory | - | - |
| Application | - | - |
| Field Work | - | - |
| Special Course Internship | - | - |
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | - | - |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 10 |
| Presentation | - | - |
| Project | - | - |
| Report | - | - |
| Seminar | - | - |
| Midterms Exams/Midterms Jury | 1 | 35 |
| Final Exam/Final Jury | 1 | 40 |
| Toplam | 4 | 100 |
| Percentage of Semester Work | 60 |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Final Work | 40 |
| Total | 100 |
Course Category
| Core Courses | |
|---|---|
| Major Area Courses | X |
| Supportive Courses | |
| Media and Managment Skills Courses | |
| Transferable Skill Courses |
The Relation Between Course Learning Competencies and Program Qualifications
| # | Program Qualifications / Competencies | Level of Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | Students can learn the basic concepts, theories and methods of political science and public administration and use them in the analysis of national and global political developments and cause-effect relationships. | X | ||||
| 2 | It enables one to understand how policies are created and implemented in real life at the local, national, regional and/or global level, to recognize the important institutions and actors that play a role in these processes, and to know the functioning of public administration. | |||||
| 3 | It provides a basic level of knowledge about other fields related to political science and public administration disciplines (such as international relations, sociology, psychology, cultural studies, economics, law, history, etc.) and thus provides an interdisciplinary understanding that takes into account the relationships between different areas of life and establishes connections. | |||||
| 4 | Learning the use of quantitative and/or qualitative research techniques that can be used in the field of political science and public administration, software, hardware and/or technical tools that can be useful; gaining experience in designing and executing research projects to develop their application skills in this field. | |||||
| 5 | By promoting critical analytical thinking, intellectual debate and lifelong learning, the development of the ability to act with an open mind, to avoid discrimination and to be sensitive and respectful of different points of view, thus developing skills for acting in partnership. | |||||
| 6 | To develop decision-making and initiative taking, work completion and time management competencies by understanding business ethics in public administration, politics and all related fields. | |||||
| 7 | Developing communication skills, oral and written expression, presentation techniques; learning the writing principles and procedures required to write an academic article on political science and public administration disciplines. | |||||
| 8 | The aim of the course is to master the English terminology in the disciplines of political science and public administration and to gain foreign language knowledge at a level to follow the studies written in English, so that current political developments and events in various countries can be analysed comparatively. | |||||
| 9 | To know the political history of both Turkey and the world in terms of periods, important turning points and actors, to comprehend the impact of the social-historical backgrounds of countries on current political and administrative issues. | X | ||||
ECTS/Workload Table
| Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Hours (Including Exam Week: 16 x Total Hours) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | |||
| Application | |||
| Special Course Internship | |||
| Field Work | |||
| Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Presentation/Seminar Prepration | |||
| Project | |||
| Report | |||
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | |||
| Prepration of Midterm Exams/Midterm Jury | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Prepration of Final Exams/Final Jury | 1 | 25 | 25 |
| Total Workload | 125 | ||