ECTS - Non-Judicial Dispute Resolution in Administrative Law
Non-Judicial Dispute Resolution in Administrative Law (KMH614) Course Detail
Course Name | Course Code | Season | Lecture Hours | Application Hours | Lab Hours | Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-Judicial Dispute Resolution in Administrative Law | KMH614 | Area Elective | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Pre-requisite Course(s) |
---|
N/A |
Course Language | English |
---|---|
Course Type | Elective Courses |
Course Level | Ph.D. |
Mode of Delivery | Face To Face |
Learning and Teaching Strategies | . |
Course Lecturer(s) |
|
Course Objectives | In the light of general knowledge of administrative law literature; It is aimed to examine the functionality of the existence of the basic concepts, institutions and principles belonging to this branch of law and the current problems encountered in practice. |
Course Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Content | Non-judicial inspection, conciliation, reconcilation, mediation. |
Weekly Subjects and Releated Preparation Studies
Week | Subjects | Preparation |
---|---|---|
1 | Discussing and analyzing the historical position, sources and qualifications of administrative law in its emergence as a branch of law | - CİDECİGİLLER Aynur, İdarenin Taraf Olduğu Uyuşmazlıkların Sulh Yolu İle Giderilmesi, Ankara Adalet Yayınevi, 2015. - ODYAKMAZ, Zehra, “İdarî Uyuşmazlıklarda Alternatif Çözüm Yolları (Türk Mevzuatı ve Uygulamaları)” Uyuşmazlıkların Alternatif Çözüm Yolları Sempozyumu, 2006, Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Yayınları, s. 63 – 83. |
2 | Evaluation of the position of the administration in the state structure, the rules and principles to which it is subject. Examining the related concepts by making use of legislative knowledge and judicial decisions regarding the subject and making sense of them using different interpretation techniques. | - CİDECİGİLLER Aynur, İdarenin Taraf Olduğu Uyuşmazlıkların Sulh Yolu İle Giderilmesi, Ankara Adalet Yayınevi, 2015. - ODYAKMAZ, Zehra, “İdarî Uyuşmazlıklarda Alternatif Çözüm Yolları (Türk Mevzuatı ve Uygulamaları)” Uyuşmazlıkların Alternatif Çözüm Yolları Sempozyumu, 2006, Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Yayınları, s. 63 – 83. |
3 | Evaluation of the relationship between the administration and fundamental rights and freedoms by evaluating the means of action of administrative law. | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “İdari Uyuşmazlıkların Çözümünde Yargılama Dışı Usuller (I), Birinci Bölüm Türk Hukukunda ve Mukayeseli Hukukta İdari Uyuşmazlıkların Çözümünde Yargılama Dışı Usuller”, TBB Dergisi, S. 56, 2005, s. 9-132. |
4 | After the theoretical evaluation and interpretation of administrative law knowledge, revealing the current problems. | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “İdari Uyuşmazlıkların Çözümünde Yargılama Dışı Usuller (I), Birinci Bölüm Türk Hukukunda ve Mukayeseli Hukukta İdari Uyuşmazlıkların Çözümünde Yargılama Dışı Usuller”, TBB Dergisi, S. 56, 2005, s. 9-132. |
5 | Discussing the problems related to practice by examining which fundamental rights and freedoms the current concepts and institutions of administrative law are in contact with. | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 2. B. Ankara Yetkin Yayınları 2009. - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “Dünya Çapındaki Adalete Ulaşma Hareketiyle Ortaya Çıkan Gelişmeler ve Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü”, AÜHFD, C. 1, S. 2, 2002, s. 121-162. |
6 | presentation | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 2. B. Ankara Yetkin Yayınları 2009. - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “Dünya Çapındaki Adalete Ulaşma Hareketiyle Ortaya Çıkan Gelişmeler ve Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü”, AÜHFD, C. 1, S. 2, 2002, s. 121-162. |
7 | presentation | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 2. B. Ankara Yetkin Yayınları 2009. - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “Dünya Çapındaki Adalete Ulaşma Hareketiyle Ortaya Çıkan Gelişmeler ve Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü”, AÜHFD, C. 1, S. 2, 2002, s. 121-162. |
8 | midterm | |
9 | presentation | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 2. B. Ankara Yetkin Yayınları 2009. - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “Dünya Çapındaki Adalete Ulaşma Hareketiyle Ortaya Çıkan Gelişmeler ve Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü”, AÜHFD, C. 1, S. 2, 2002, s. 121-162. |
10 | presentation | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 2. B. Ankara Yetkin Yayınları 2009. - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “Dünya Çapındaki Adalete Ulaşma Hareketiyle Ortaya Çıkan Gelişmeler ve Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü”, AÜHFD, C. 1, S. 2, 2002, s. 121-162. |
11 | presentation | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 2. B. Ankara Yetkin Yayınları 2009. - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “Dünya Çapındaki Adalete Ulaşma Hareketiyle Ortaya Çıkan Gelişmeler ve Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü”, AÜHFD, C. 1, S. 2, 2002, s. 121-162. |
12 | general evaluation | |
13 | presentation | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 2. B. Ankara Yetkin Yayınları 2009. - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “Dünya Çapındaki Adalete Ulaşma Hareketiyle Ortaya Çıkan Gelişmeler ve Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü”, AÜHFD, C. 1, S. 2, 2002, s. 121-162. |
14 | General Evaluation | - ÖZBEK Mustafa, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 2. B. Ankara Yetkin Yayınları 2009. - ÖZBEK Mustafa, “Dünya Çapındaki Adalete Ulaşma Hareketiyle Ortaya Çıkan Gelişmeler ve Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü”, AÜHFD, C. 1, S. 2, 2002, s. 121-162. |
15 | Final Exam |
Sources
Course Book | 1. Metin Günday, İdare Hukuku, İmaj Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2017. |
---|---|
3. Kemal GÖZLER, İdare Hukuku, Cilt I ve Cilt II, Ekin Kitabevi, Bursa, 2009. |
Evaluation System
Requirements | Number | Percentage of Grade |
---|---|---|
Attendance/Participation | - | - |
Laboratory | - | - |
Application | - | - |
Field Work | - | - |
Special Course Internship | - | - |
Quizzes/Studio Critics | - | - |
Homework Assignments | - | - |
Presentation | - | - |
Project | - | - |
Report | - | - |
Seminar | - | - |
Midterms Exams/Midterms Jury | 1 | 30 |
Final Exam/Final Jury | 1 | 70 |
Toplam | 2 | 100 |
Percentage of Semester Work | |
---|---|
Percentage of Final Work | 100 |
Total | 100 |
Course Category
Core Courses | X |
---|---|
Major Area Courses | |
Supportive Courses | |
Media and Managment Skills Courses | |
Transferable Skill Courses |
The Relation Between Course Learning Competencies and Program Qualifications
# | Program Qualifications / Competencies | Level of Contribution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | Improves the knowledge of concepts, institutions and methods in the field of Public Law at the level of expertise. | X | ||||
2 | Makes original definitions and qualifications about legal concepts and methods. | X | ||||
3 | To analyze and evaluate the problems of public law relations by using the information obtained, reaches new and original results and thoughts. | X | ||||
4 | Evaluates an existing or a new concept or institution in the field of Public Law with a new thought, approach and method. | X | ||||
5 | Have the ability to understand and process the national and international dimensions of law by following court jurisprudence and practices. | X | ||||
6 | Have the ability to diagnose and solve public law problems. | X | ||||
7 | Gains original perspective in the field of public law. | X | ||||
8 | Has the ability to conduct research in the field of Public Law and to produce an original scientific work. | X | ||||
9 | Gains the ability to make oral and written presentations in accordance with academic and ethical rules. | X | ||||
10 | Establishes an effective communication in defending his / her original views and showing his competence in the field of public law issues. | X | ||||
11 | Has the ability to solve current legal problems within the framework of contemporary legal approaches. | X | ||||
12 | It contributes to the establishment and implementation of legal and academic ethical rules. | X | ||||
13 | It contributes to the establishment of the awareness of law and justice in the society and the process of sustaining it. | X | ||||
14 | Students will have the ability to interact effectively by using strategic decision-making processes in solving problems arising from legal theory and practice and affecting social life. | X | ||||
15 | It contributes to the theory and practice of law by publishing at least one scientific article in the field of Public Law in national or international refereed and / or reputable journals. | X |
ECTS/Workload Table
Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Total Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Course Hours (Including Exam Week: 16 x Total Hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
Laboratory | |||
Application | |||
Special Course Internship | |||
Field Work | |||
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Presentation/Seminar Prepration | 2 | 5 | 10 |
Project | 2 | 5 | 10 |
Report | |||
Homework Assignments | 1 | 5 | 5 |
Quizzes/Studio Critics | |||
Prepration of Midterm Exams/Midterm Jury | 1 | 15 | 15 |
Prepration of Final Exams/Final Jury | 2 | 10 | 20 |
Total Workload | 150 |