ECTS - Administrative Judiciary and Right to a Fair Trial
Administrative Judiciary and Right to a Fair Trial (KMH608) Course Detail
| Course Name | Course Code | Season | Lecture Hours | Application Hours | Lab Hours | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative Judiciary and Right to a Fair Trial | KMH608 | Area Elective | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Pre-requisite Course(s) |
|---|
| N/A |
| Course Language | English |
|---|---|
| Course Type | Elective Courses |
| Course Level | Ph.D. |
| Mode of Delivery | Face To Face |
| Learning and Teaching Strategies | . |
| Course Lecturer(s) |
|
| Course Objectives | Examining the institutions specific to the administrative judiciary within the framework of the freedom of seeking rights of doctoral students |
| Course Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Content | The right to a fair trial the Constitution and in the European Convention on Human Rights, the rules in the jurisdiction, the evaluation of the application mechanisms within the framework of the right to a fair trial and the examination of the relevant court decisions. |
Weekly Subjects and Releated Preparation Studies
| Week | Subjects | Preparation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Freedom of claim in the Constitution and its scope | Nurcan Yılmaz Özel, Adil Yargılanma Hakkı Kriterlerinin Türk İdari Yargılama Hukuku Açısından Muhtemel ve Gerçekleşen Etkileri, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2016 Zühal Aysun Sunay, İdari Yargılama Hukukunda İptal Davalarında Gerekçeli Karar Hakkı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2016. |
| 2 | Meaning of ECHR and Constitutional provisions in administrative justice | Nurcan Yılmaz Özel, Adil Yargılanma Hakkı Kriterlerinin Türk İdari Yargılama Hukuku Açısından Muhtemel ve Gerçekleşen Etkileri, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2016 Zühal Aysun Sunay, İdari Yargılama Hukukunda İptal Davalarında Gerekçeli Karar Hakkı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2016. |
| 3 | Obligatory peace and appeal remedies in terms of freedom of claim | Nurcan Yılmaz Özel, Adil Yargılanma Hakkı Kriterlerinin Türk İdari Yargılama Hukuku Açısından Muhtemel ve Gerçekleşen Etkileri, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2016 Zühal Aysun Sunay, İdari Yargılama Hukukunda İptal Davalarında Gerekçeli Karar Hakkı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2016. |
| 4 | Extra-judicial mechanisms in the freedom of claim | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. Melikşah Yasin, İdari Yargılama Usulünde İspat, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2015. |
| 5 | Limit of administrative jurisdiction and freedom of claim: Legislative and judicial curtailment | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. Melikşah Yasin, İdari Yargılama Usulünde İspat, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2015. |
| 6 | Liability to sue within the framework of the freedom to seek rights | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. Melikşah Yasin, İdari Yargılama Usulünde İspat, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2015. |
| 7 | Time to file a lawsuit within the framework of the freedom to seek rights | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. |
| 8 | Correctional Institution and Implementation Problems | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. |
| 9 | Tools of Evidence and Freedom of Claim in Administrative Jurisdiction | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. |
| 10 | Mechanisms for ensuring independence and impartiality and the question of effectiveness | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. |
| 11 | Trial within a reasonable time | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. |
| 12 | Legal remedies and fair trial | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. |
| 13 | State secret documents, confidential documents, unpublished transactions, right to information and freedom of claim | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. |
| 14 | Protection of personal data and fair trial relationship | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. |
| 15 | Implementation of Court Decisions and Freedom of Claim | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. |
| 16 | general evaluation |
Sources
| Course Book | 1. Nurcan Yılmaz Özel, Adil Yargılanma Hakkı Kriterlerinin Türk İdari Yargılama Hukuku Açısından Muhtemel ve Gerçekleşen Etkileri, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2016 |
|---|---|
| 2. Zühal Aysun Sunay, İdari Yargılama Hukukunda İptal Davalarında Gerekçeli Karar Hakkı, Seçkin, Ankara, 2016. | |
| 3. Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı: Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, İstanbul, 2013. | |
| 4. Burak Öztürk, Hak Arama Özgürlüğü Çerçevesinde Zorunlu İdari İtiraz, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2015. |
Evaluation System
| Requirements | Number | Percentage of Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance/Participation | 1 | 20 |
| Laboratory | - | - |
| Application | - | - |
| Field Work | - | - |
| Special Course Internship | - | - |
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | - | - |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 30 |
| Presentation | 1 | 20 |
| Project | - | - |
| Report | - | - |
| Seminar | - | - |
| Midterms Exams/Midterms Jury | - | - |
| Final Exam/Final Jury | 1 | 30 |
| Toplam | 4 | 100 |
| Percentage of Semester Work | |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Final Work | 100 |
| Total | 100 |
Course Category
| Core Courses | X |
|---|---|
| Major Area Courses | |
| Supportive Courses | |
| Media and Managment Skills Courses | |
| Transferable Skill Courses |
The Relation Between Course Learning Competencies and Program Qualifications
| # | Program Qualifications / Competencies | Level of Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | Improves the knowledge of concepts, institutions and methods in the field of Public Law at the level of expertise. | X | ||||
| 2 | Makes original definitions and qualifications about legal concepts and methods. | X | ||||
| 3 | To analyze and evaluate the problems of public law relations by using the information obtained, reaches new and original results and thoughts. | X | ||||
| 4 | Evaluates an existing or a new concept or institution in the field of Public Law with a new thought, approach and method. | X | ||||
| 5 | Have the ability to understand and process the national and international dimensions of law by following court jurisprudence and practices. | X | ||||
| 6 | Have the ability to diagnose and solve public law problems. | X | ||||
| 7 | Gains original perspective in the field of public law. | X | ||||
| 8 | Has the ability to conduct research in the field of Public Law and to produce an original scientific work. | X | ||||
| 9 | Gains the ability to make oral and written presentations in accordance with academic and ethical rules. | X | ||||
| 10 | Establishes an effective communication in defending his / her original views and showing his competence in the field of public law issues. | X | ||||
| 11 | Has the ability to solve current legal problems within the framework of contemporary legal approaches. | X | ||||
| 12 | It contributes to the establishment and implementation of legal and academic ethical rules. | X | ||||
| 13 | It contributes to the establishment of the awareness of law and justice in the society and the process of sustaining it. | X | ||||
| 14 | Students will have the ability to interact effectively by using strategic decision-making processes in solving problems arising from legal theory and practice and affecting social life. | X | ||||
| 15 | It contributes to the theory and practice of law by publishing at least one scientific article in the field of Public Law in national or international refereed and / or reputable journals. | X | ||||
ECTS/Workload Table
| Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Hours (Including Exam Week: 16 x Total Hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Laboratory | |||
| Application | |||
| Special Course Internship | |||
| Field Work | |||
| Study Hours Out of Class | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Presentation/Seminar Prepration | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Project | |||
| Report | |||
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | |||
| Prepration of Midterm Exams/Midterm Jury | |||
| Prepration of Final Exams/Final Jury | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Total Workload | 70 | ||