ECTS - Method at Law and Solving Problems
Method at Law and Solving Problems (LAW375) Course Detail
| Course Name | Course Code | Season | Lecture Hours | Application Hours | Lab Hours | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method at Law and Solving Problems | LAW375 | Area Elective | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Pre-requisite Course(s) |
|---|
| N/A |
| Course Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Course Type | Elective Courses |
| Course Level | Bachelor’s Degree (First Cycle) |
| Mode of Delivery | Face To Face |
| Learning and Teaching Strategies | Lecture, Discussion, Question and Answer, Drill and Practice, Problem Solving. |
| Course Lecturer(s) |
|
| Course Objectives | To consider the tack/tacks (methods) to be followed in solving law problems both theoretically and practically. |
| Course Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Content | Relation of law and language, thinking, asking, detecting and solving problems, relation of law, mathematic and logic, notion of fair at law, method at law, solving of concrete / adversarial law problems. |
Weekly Subjects and Releated Preparation Studies
| Week | Subjects | Preparation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The subject, scope and purpose of the course, in general law methodology and what it will gain and relation of other fields and boundaries of methodology. | |
| 2 | Reading, reading at law education, importance of reading, critical reading, good readership. | Çifçi,Musa: Eleştirel Okuma, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/721400 |
| 3 | Relation of law and language, relation of word, term, notion and importance of these at law, the law norms. | Karayalçın/Yongalık, p. 3-10 |
| 4 | Relation of law and mathematics. | Karayalçın/Yongalık, p. 172 vd |
| 5 | Relation of law and logic, fairness in way of form and subject, logical and ethical fairness at law, fairness at norms, events and decisions, justification. | Karayalçın/Yongalık, p. 172 vd |
| 6 | General principles of formal logic and law, interpretation at law in general. | Karayalçın/Yongalık, p. 174 ff, 204 ff. |
| 7 | Midterm. | |
| 8 | Logical errors that a lawyer should not do, fallacies and examples. | Karayalçın/Yongalık, p. 181-183; Serozan, p. 14-16. |
| 9 | Reasoning, logical tools of reasoning especially deduction and induction methods, syllogism. | Karayalçın/Yongalık, p. 179 ff. |
| 10 | Law problems, differences between concrete/ adversarial law problems and abstract law problems. | Karayalçın/Yongalık, s. 237 ff. |
| 11 | Method at solving of the concrete/ adversarial law problems. | Karayalçın/Yongalık, s. 253 ff. |
| 12 | To understand, define, schematize the event and to detect law problems - examples. | Karayalçın/Yongalık, s. 253 ff. |
| 13 | To examine court decisions. | Implementation of solving concrete and adversarial law problems will be made since this week. The decisions which will be solved at lessons will be shared with students before the lessons. |
| 14 | To examine court decisions. | |
| 15 | To examine court decisions. | |
| 16 | Final exam. |
Sources
| Course Book | 1. Karayalçın, Yaşar/ Yongalık, Aynur: Hukukda Öğretim-Kaynaklar-Metod Problem Çözme, 8. Bası, Ankara 2020. |
|---|---|
| Other Sources | 2. Hirş, Ernst E.: Pratik Hukukta Metot, 8. Bası, Ankara 2021. |
| 3. Edis, Seyfullah: Medenî Hukuka Giriş ve Başlangıç Hükümleri, 4. Bası, Ankara 1989. | |
| 4. Serozan, Rona: Hukukta Yöntem – Mantık, 2. Bası, İstanbul 2017. | |
| 5. Yongalık, Aynur: “İstisnalar Dar Yorumlanır” Kuralı ve Değerlendirilmesi, AÜHFD, 60 (1) 2011:1-15. | |
| 6. Yongalık, Aynur: “Adi Şirkete Yeni Giren Ortağın Eski Borçlardan Dolayı Sorumluluğu Hakkında Alman Federal Mahkemesinin 7.4.2003 Tarihli Kararı – Bir Metodoloji Sorunu”, Prof Dr. Tuğrul Ansay’a Armağan, Ankara, 2006. s. 525-543. |
Evaluation System
| Requirements | Number | Percentage of Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance/Participation | 1 | 10 |
| Laboratory | - | - |
| Application | - | - |
| Field Work | - | - |
| Special Course Internship | - | - |
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | - | - |
| Homework Assignments | - | - |
| Presentation | - | - |
| Project | - | - |
| Report | - | - |
| Seminar | - | - |
| Midterms Exams/Midterms Jury | 1 | 30 |
| Final Exam/Final Jury | 1 | 60 |
| Toplam | 3 | 100 |
| Percentage of Semester Work | 30 |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Final Work | 70 |
| Total | 100 |
Course Category
| Core Courses | X |
|---|---|
| Major Area Courses | |
| Supportive Courses | |
| Media and Managment Skills Courses | |
| Transferable Skill Courses |
The Relation Between Course Learning Competencies and Program Qualifications
| # | Program Qualifications / Competencies | Level of Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
ECTS/Workload Table
| Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Hours (Including Exam Week: 16 x Total Hours) | 16 | 2 | 32 |
| Laboratory | |||
| Application | |||
| Special Course Internship | |||
| Field Work | |||
| Study Hours Out of Class | 8 | 2 | 16 |
| Presentation/Seminar Prepration | |||
| Project | |||
| Report | |||
| Homework Assignments | |||
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | |||
| Prepration of Midterm Exams/Midterm Jury | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Prepration of Final Exams/Final Jury | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Total Workload | 78 | ||