ECTS - Rhetoric: Beautiful and Effective Speaking Art
Rhetoric: Beautiful and Effective Speaking Art (ART288) Course Detail
| Course Name | Course Code | Season | Lecture Hours | Application Hours | Lab Hours | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhetoric: Beautiful and Effective Speaking Art | ART288 | Fall and Spring | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Pre-requisite Course(s) |
|---|
| N/A |
| Course Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Course Type | Elective Courses |
| Course Level | Bachelor’s Degree (First Cycle) |
| Mode of Delivery | Face To Face |
| Learning and Teaching Strategies | Lecture, Discussion. |
| Course Lecturer(s) |
|
| Course Objectives | The aim of the course: As an individual being able to tend to more positive opinions and behaviours, to influence and convince listeners, by following the rules of tone, diction, emphasis and mimicry. |
| Course Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Content | Expressing thoughts and opinions in the best, most effective and most accurate manner, speaking effectively, and persuading communities. |
Weekly Subjects and Releated Preparation Studies
| Week | Subjects | Preparation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What is rhetoric? | |
| 2 | The Elements of Rhetoric | |
| 3 | Etos - Logos - Pathos - Kairos | |
| 4 | Dialectical | |
| 5 | Differences between Rhetoric and Dialectics | |
| 6 | Rhetoric and Great Mantles | |
| 7 | Dialectic and Person | |
| 8 | The Place of Rhetoric in the Early Age Philosophy | |
| 9 | Aristotle, Aristotle's Rhetoric | |
| 10 | Aristotle's Rhetoric Poetics | |
| 11 | Nature and Definition of Poetika | |
| 12 | Atatürk and “Nutuk” | |
| 13 | Speech and Presentation Techniques | |
| 14 | Rules to be followed in order to be a good speaker | |
| 15 | Presentation exercises | |
| 16 | Final Evaluation |
Sources
| Other Sources | 1. Aristoteles. (2000). Politika. Mete Tunçay (Çev.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi. |
|---|---|
| 2. Atatürk, M. K. (2015). Nutuk. İstanbul: Karanfil Yayınları. | |
| 3. Duman, M.A. (2015). Platon’un Retorik Anlayışı. İstanbul: Litera Yayınevi. | |
| 4. Meyer, M. (2009). Retorik. İsmail Yerguz (Çev.). Ankara: Dost Yayınları. | |
| 5. Karaaslan Şanlı, H. (2012). Hasan Ali Yücel Konuşmaları Ulusal Kimlik İnşası ve Politik Retorik. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınevi. | |
| 6. Selen, N. (1971). Söz Söyleme Sanatının Tarihsel Gelişimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1-4), 1-23. | |
| 7. Şenbay, N. (2008). Söz ve Diksiyon Sanatı. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. |
Evaluation System
| Requirements | Number | Percentage of Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance/Participation | 15 | 10 |
| Laboratory | - | - |
| Application | 10 | 20 |
| Field Work | - | - |
| Special Course Internship | - | - |
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | - | - |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 20 |
| Presentation | - | - |
| Project | - | - |
| Report | - | - |
| Seminar | - | - |
| Midterms Exams/Midterms Jury | 1 | 20 |
| Final Exam/Final Jury | 1 | 30 |
| Toplam | 28 | 100 |
| Percentage of Semester Work | 70 |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Final Work | 30 |
| Total | 100 |
Course Category
| Core Courses | X |
|---|---|
| Major Area Courses | |
| Supportive Courses | |
| Media and Managment Skills Courses | |
| Transferable Skill Courses |
The Relation Between Course Learning Competencies and Program Qualifications
| # | Program Qualifications / Competencies | Level of Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | Adequate knowledge in mathematics, science and subjects specific to the software engineering discipline; the ability to apply theoretical and practical knowledge of these areas to complex engineering problems. | |||||
| 2 | The ability to identify, define, formulate and solve complex engineering problems; selecting and applying proper analysis and modeling techniques for this purpose. | |||||
| 3 | The ability to design a complex system, process, device or product under realistic constraints and conditions to meet specific requirements; the ability to apply modern design methods for this purpose. | |||||
| 4 | The ability to develop, select and utilize modern techniques and tools essential for the analysis and determination of complex problems in software engineering applications; the ability to utilize information technologies effectively. | |||||
| 5 | The ability to gather data, analyze and interpret results for the investigation of complex engineering problems or research topics specific to the software engineering discipline. | |||||
| 6 | The ability to work effectively in inter/inner disciplinary teams; ability to work individually. | |||||
| 7 | Effective oral and written communication skills in Turkish; the ability to write effective reports and comprehend written reports, to prepare design and production reports, to make effective presentations, to give and receive clear and understandable instructions. | |||||
| 8 | The knowledge of at least one foreign language; the ability to write effective reports and comprehend written reports, to prepare design and production reports, to make effective presentations, to give and receive clear and understandable instructions. | |||||
| 9 | Recognition of the need for lifelong learning; the ability to access information and follow recent developments in science and technology with continuous self-development | X | ||||
| 10 | The ability to behave according to ethical principles, awareness of professional and ethical responsibility. | |||||
| 11 | Knowledge of the standards utilized in software engineering applications. | |||||
| 12 | Knowledge on business practices such as project management, risk management and change management. | |||||
| 13 | Awareness about entrepreneurship, and innovation. | |||||
| 14 | Knowledge on sustainable development. | |||||
| 15 | Knowledge of the effects of software engineering applications on the universal and social dimensions of health, environment, and safety. | |||||
| 16 | Awareness of the legal consequences of engineering solutions. | |||||
| 17 | An ability to apply algorithmic principles, mathematical foundations, and computer science theory in the modeling and design of computer-based systems with the trade-offs involved in design choices. | |||||
| 18 | The ability to apply engineering approach to the development of software systems by analyzing, designing, implementing, verifying, validating and maintaining software systems. | |||||
ECTS/Workload Table
| Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Hours (Including Exam Week: 16 x Total Hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Laboratory | |||
| Application | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Special Course Internship | |||
| Field Work | |||
| Study Hours Out of Class | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Presentation/Seminar Prepration | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Project | |||
| Report | |||
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | |||
| Prepration of Midterm Exams/Midterm Jury | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Prepration of Final Exams/Final Jury | 1 | 12 | 12 |
| Total Workload | 100 | ||