ECTS - American Foreign Policy
American Foreign Policy (UI512) Course Detail
| Course Name | Course Code | Season | Lecture Hours | Application Hours | Lab Hours | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Foreign Policy | UI512 | General Elective | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Pre-requisite Course(s) |
|---|
| N/A |
| Course Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Course Type | Elective Courses |
| Course Level | Social Sciences Master's Degree |
| Mode of Delivery | Face To Face |
| Learning and Teaching Strategies | Lecture, Discussion, Question and Answer, Problem Solving, Project Design/Management. |
| Course Lecturer(s) |
|
| Course Objectives | - to examine the historical determinants of American foreign policy - to investigate the current unfolding of the American global hegemony |
| Course Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Content | The development of American foreign policy in the twentieth century, during and after the Cold War, Turkish American relations-Cold War, a new geopolitics. |
Weekly Subjects and Releated Preparation Studies
| Week | Subjects | Preparation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A general introduction to the course | |
| 2 | Who won the Cold War? | |
| 3 | American National Security Concept and the Start of the Cold War | |
| 4 | Cold War | |
| 5 | After the Cold War | |
| 6 | End of American Hegemony? | |
| 7 | American-European Relations | |
| 8 | Visa exam | |
| 9 | Turkish American Relations – Cold War | |
| 10 | Post– Cold War Turkish American Relations | |
| 11 | Turkish American Relations and the Middle East | |
| 12 | A new geopolitics | |
| 13 | Student presentations | |
| 14 | Student presentations | |
| 15 | Review | |
| 16 | Final examination |
Sources
| Course Book | 1. John Ikenberry (ed), American Foreign Policy Theoretical Essays, (New York: Harper Collins), 1996. |
|---|---|
| 2. • Burcu Bostanoğlu, Türkiye-Amerikan İlişkilerinin Politikası, (Ankara: İmge), 2008. | |
| Other Sources | 3. • Frank Ninkovich, “The New Empire,” The Imperial Moment içinde, (ed) Kimberly Kagan, (Cambridge: Harvard UP), 2010. |
| 4. • Ikenberry, “The Myth of Post-Cold War Chaos,” Foreign Affairs, 75:3 (1996), 79-91. | |
| 5. • Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars, (Princeton: Princeton UP), 2001. | |
| 6. • Joseph Nye, “The Future of American Power,” Foreign Affairs, 2010. | |
| 7. • Joseph Nye, “Transformational Leadership and US Grand Strategy,” Foreign Affairs, 2006. | |
| 8. • Kemal Karpat, Türk Dış Politikası Tarihi, (İstanbul: Timaş), 2012. | |
| 9. • Mann, “Delusions of Empire: Recent Neo-Conservative and Neo-Liberal Writings on American Foreign Policy,” Socio-Economic Review, 2 (2004), 391-404. | |
| 10. • Marc Jason Gilbert, “Fatal Amnesia: American Nation-Building in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq,” Journal of Third World Studies, 21:2 (2004), 13- 43. | |
| 11. • Melvyn P. Leffler & Jeffrey W. Legro (eds), In Uncertain Times: American Foreign Policy after the Berlin Wall and 9/11, (New York, Cornell University Press), 2011. | |
| 12. • Morales, “US Intervention and the New World Order: Lessons from Cold War and Post-Cold War Cases,” Third World Quarterly, 15:1 (1994), 77-101. | |
| 13. • R. Lavrence Moore and Maurizio Vaudagna, The American Century in Europe, (Ithaca: Cornell UP), 2003. | |
| 14. • Robert O. Keohane, “Hegemony and After,” Foreign Affairs, 2012. | |
| 15. • Rosenau, “Illusions of Power and Empire,” History and Theory, 44 (2005), 73-87. | |
| 16. • Stratfor, “The Geopolitics of the US, Part 1: The Inevitable Empire,” | |
| 17. • Zgibniew Brzezinsky, Stratejik Vizyon: Amerika ve Küresel Güç Buhranı, (İstanbul: Timaş) 2012. |
Evaluation System
| Requirements | Number | Percentage of Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance/Participation | 1 | 10 |
| Laboratory | - | - |
| Application | - | - |
| Field Work | - | - |
| Special Course Internship | - | - |
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | - | - |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 30 |
| Presentation | - | - |
| Project | - | - |
| Report | - | - |
| Seminar | - | - |
| Midterms Exams/Midterms Jury | 1 | 20 |
| Final Exam/Final Jury | 1 | 40 |
| Toplam | 4 | 100 |
| Percentage of Semester Work | 60 |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Final Work | 40 |
| Total | 100 |
Course Category
| Core Courses | X |
|---|---|
| Major Area Courses | |
| Supportive Courses | |
| Media and Managment Skills Courses | |
| Transferable Skill Courses |
The Relation Between Course Learning Competencies and Program Qualifications
| # | Program Qualifications / Competencies | Level of Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | Conceptual, theoretical and methodological mastery over political science and public administration disciplines. | |||||
| 2 | Acquiring a multidisciplinary perspective in political science and public administration disciplines. | |||||
| 3 | Acquiring the necessary methodological understanding and skill in political science and public administration disciplines. | |||||
ECTS/Workload Table
| Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Hours (Including Exam Week: 16 x Total Hours) | |||
| Laboratory | |||
| Application | |||
| Special Course Internship | |||
| Field Work | |||
| Study Hours Out of Class | |||
| Presentation/Seminar Prepration | |||
| Project | |||
| Report | |||
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 25 | 25 |
| Quizzes/Studio Critics | |||
| Prepration of Midterm Exams/Midterm Jury | 1 | 25 | 25 |
| Prepration of Final Exams/Final Jury | 1 | 75 | 75 |
| Total Workload | 125 | ||